Jay Evensen
  • Front Page
  • Opinions
  • Second Thoughts
  • Portfolio
  • Awards
  • About

Why was Prop 3 changed? Voters contradicted themselves

2/11/2019

0 Comments

 
Simply put, the problem is this: Last November, Utah voters contradicted themselves.
On the one hand, they voted to pass Proposition 3, which expanded Medicaid coverage to people earning up to 138 percent of the federal poverty line, as called for under Obamacare.
On the other hand, they voted to put people in charge of the Legislature who, generally speaking, dislike Obamacare and view Medicaid expansion as fiscally irresponsible.
What did you expect would happen?
Democracy’s ultimate check-and-balance is the voting booth. But since Utah voters rarely deviate from choosing Republicans, and since this is not an election year, the result of this collision was easy to predict.
Metaphorically, the Legislature is driving a tractor trailer. Voters are in a small economy car.
Lawmakers plowed ahead with a watered down version of Proposition 3, which passed Monday. Voters were sent careening and spiraling off the road.
This isn’t some grand political statement or an argument to choose one party over another; just an observation. Voters make decisions based on a variety of factors. But if you’re trying to zero in on Medicaid expansion to understand what happened, the contradiction is hard to miss.
During the hearings and floor debates, much was said about how some lawmakers never, in their wildest dreams, would have considered passing a Medicaid expansion bill of any sort, even one that is significantly less than what Proposition 3 called for, before last year’s election.
Sen. Jacob Anderegg, R-Lehi, said over and over again on the Senate floor Monday how much he hated the bill, just before he voted for it. He didn’t have a choice, he said. Voters wanted expansion, and if lawmakers didn’t pass the watered-down version, Utah would be left with Proposition 3.
So in that strange sense, the Legislature heard the people.
But make no mistake — what they passed is not what people voted for.
Proposition 3 would have covered everyone earning up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level. Utah’s new law covers those earning up to 100 percent and leaves the rest to find private insurance on a heavily subsidized exchange, where they will have to pay some money out-of-pocket for monthly premiums, depending on their income.
The plan is more complicated than that, relying on Washington to approve waivers. But that is its essence.
The arguments for changing what voters approved seemed to coalesce around two themes.
The first is a series of questions that came up again and again: Do we really want to make Medicaid, or healthcare for the state’s poorest residents, a priority of state government? If so, should it compete with education for funding?
The second came in assurances that the private insurance exchange would take care of those not covered by Medicaid.
The first is a gamble, and the second miscalculates what it means to be poor. But both are consistent with the political philosophies of the people voters chose as representatives.
It’s impossible to know exactly what voters were trying to say when they approved Medicaid expansion, but it wouldn’t be a stretch to say they wanted care for the poor to rise among lawmakers’ funding priorities.
As for subsidized insurance, it’s important to note that an adult earning 138 percent of the poverty level makes $16,643. After rent, food and transportation costs, even $20 a month must be hard to find.
A thread running through both themes is the notion, mentioned out loud more than once, that people didn’t really understand what they were voting for. That sounds like a dangerous thing to say when your position depends on the approval of voters, but history shows it may not be much of a political gamble.
On Monday, Senate leadership reminded reporters the state is a republic, not a democracy, and that lawmakers constantly amend and change laws.
Senate President Stuart Adams passed around a chart showing how Proposition 3 would have resulted in an $83 million budget hole by 2025, and how the new version will result in a surplus. This also fits the fiscal conservatism voters apparently want in their leaders.
It’s true Utah is a republic, except that Utah’s constitution also allows for citizen initiatives, which is a form of direct democracy.
If that seems like a contradiction, it’s no more so than voting for a law and the opponents of that law at the same time.
Which reminds me, some at the Legislature now are talking about changing Proposition 4.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    Search this site


    Like what you read here?

      Please subscribe below, and we'll let you know when there is a new opinion.

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Picture

    The author

    Jay Evensen is the Senior Editorial Columnist of the Deseret News. He has nearly 40 years experience as a reporter, editor and editorial writer in Oklahoma, New York City, Las Vegas and Salt Lake City. He also has been an adjunct journalism professor at Brigham Young and Weber State universities.

    Archives

    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012

    Categories

    All
    Campaign 2012
    Congress
    Crime
    Culture
    Iran
    Oil And Gas
    Poverty
    Steroids
    Taxes
    Utah
    Washington
    World Events
    World Events

    Links

    Deseret News
    Newslink
    Marianne Evensen's blog

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.