Jay Evensen
  • Front Page
  • Opinions
  • Second Thoughts
  • Portfolio
  • Awards
  • About

Why Trump vs. Hillary is such a hard choice

10/19/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
The election, Melissa Deckman told the New York Times, “could well be the most negative in history.”
​
One prominent television ad for the Democratic nominee features a man who says he is a life-long Republican. He always votes for the Republican presidential ticket. But of this year’s nominee, he says, “This man scares me.” He says a friend assured him that just because someone acts irresponsibly during the campaign, it doesn’t mean he won’t act differently as president. “I don’t buy that.”
You may think you understand those paragraphs in the context of current events, but the first statement was made during the 2012 presidential campaign, and the second was an ad paid for by the Lyndon Johnson campaign in 1964. Barry Goldwater was the “irresponsible” man referenced.

And somehow, the republic survives and the people keep picking leaders.

Negative campaigns are a time-honored part of presidential politics, as is the hyperventilated warning that the current election is the most important in the nation’s history.

It’s true the hyperventilating has the rasp of validity this time around. Both major candidates are so unpopular that many people appear determined to vote for one just to keep the other from winning. Utah actually may award its electoral votes to a relatively unknown independent, which lends a soberness to the sound of familiar concerns.

And certainly, Donald Trump’s habit of personally and publicly mocking his opponents and others is something new. Even in the raucous 19th century, candidates did such things only in pamphlets or through surrogates.

But when you consider those early tactics referred to Abraham Lincoln as, to use modern language, a cross between a drug dealer, a thief and a man who cleans outhouses, and to John Quincy Adams as a pimp, it’s safe to say the nation has seen it all before.

That doesn’t make voting any easier, especially with so much at stake in a world where deleted emails and locker room talk seem trivial compared to existential threats.

A newly released book by author Robert Strauss, titled, “Worst. President. Ever.” (Lyons Press) unfortunately doesn’t help much. That doesn’t mean it’s not worth reading. It just means your job between now and Nov. 8 is even harder than you thought.

Strauss gives the bottom rung to James Buchanan. He makes a compelling argument. People in these parts may not like Barack Obama, but at least he won’t be handing over a nation in which several states have seceded without opposition. Buchanan felt secession was illegal, but he also felt he had no authority to stop it, so he didn’t.

But here’s the maddening thing for voters: You probably would have voted for him in 1856, or even in 2016. He was, to put it mildly, as far from Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump as a politician could get.

Strauss calls Buchanan an honest man. He made a point of not insulting anyone, including his political enemies. In other words, he nailed what we call today the “character issue.”

He was unquestionably qualified, having served in the House and Senate, as secretary of state and as ambassador to England. He had even turned down an appointment to the Supreme Court.

Despite all this, Strauss tells us, “… it seems that Buchanan was just a bad president — a poor chooser of associates, a waverer when quickness was necessary, pompous when he should have been contrite, oblivious to both current events and public thought, and living in a sheltered past in an era when America was really burgeoning on the world scene.”

Who could have foreseen all that?

The Buchanan administration offers no hope to modern voters. It doesn’t even allow people to say it shows Americans can survive bad presidents. After all, the Buchanan administration led to a Civil War that nearly wrecked the nation for good.

What it does, however, is offer a sense of how the current mud fest is largely irrelevant to the task ahead. No one can predict the crises the next president will face.

Buchanan’s downfall had to do with his core convictions. Get to those and you have the basis for a decision.
​
I told you your job was harder than you thought.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    Search this site


    Like what you read here?

      Please subscribe below, and we'll let you know when there is a new opinion.

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Picture

    The author

    Jay Evensen is the Senior Editorial Columnist of the Deseret News. He has nearly 40 years experience as a reporter, editor and editorial writer in Oklahoma, New York City, Las Vegas and Salt Lake City. He also has been an adjunct journalism professor at Brigham Young and Weber State universities.

    Archives

    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012

    Categories

    All
    Campaign 2012
    Congress
    Crime
    Culture
    Iran
    Oil And Gas
    Poverty
    Steroids
    Taxes
    Utah
    Washington
    World Events
    World Events

    Links

    Deseret News
    Newslink
    Marianne Evensen's blog

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.