| || |
Just to recap, President Obama appointed these two to come up with a realistic solution to the nation’s long-term debt problem back in 2011. They performed that duty admirably, assembling a bipartisan committee and coming up with a plan that included a little bit of what both sides want and don’t want — in other words, a compromise.
Their committee didn’t unanimously support the plan, but that’s because some of them were active politicians who didn’t want to be seen as supporting compromise.
Simpson-Bowles wanted to raise the Social Security retirement age to 69 and gradually reduce its benefits for younger people. They wanted to cut defense, cut farm subsidies and increase the federal gasoline tax by 15 cents a gallon.
On the income tax side, they wanted to cut marginal rates considerably (this means less out-of-pocket money from you on April 15). But they also would have gotten rid of a lot of tax deductions, such what you can claim for interest paid on mortgages or for charitable giving. For every $1 raised in new taxes through the loss of these deductions, their plan would have cut $2 to $3.
Their plan was so good the president immediately ignored it and no one in the House or Senate championed it. Instead, everyone retreated to their WWI-vintage trenches and kept lobbing bombs at each other.
Congress may well reach a deal this week. Early reports say the plan might push the next debt ceiling crisis back until after Christmas.
Really? That’s the best we can do? Does the nation have to live crisis to crisis?
I’ve never said Simpson-Bowles was a perfect solution. But any real solution to long-term debt has to look something like what they have recommended.
If the current “shutdown” were about pushing a plan similar to this, I would be all for it. What we have now, though, is each side ramming its pure ideology headlong into the other, nibbling the edges of Obamacare and ignoring the kinds of grand solutions that would require real political courage.
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply.
Search this site
Like what you read here?
Please subscribe below, and we'll let you know when there is a new opinion.
Jay Evensen is the Senior Editorial Columnist of the Deseret News. He has nearly 40 years experience as a reporter, editor and editorial writer in Oklahoma, New York City, Las Vegas and Salt Lake City. He also has been an adjunct journalism professor at Brigham Young and Weber State universities.