Jay Evensen
  • Front Page
  • Opinions
  • Second Thoughts
  • Portfolio
  • Awards
  • About

What Americans really thought of Lincoln's assassination

4/8/2015

1 Comment

 
Picture
No matter how far America travels down the roads of time, the Civil War never seems too far behind.

Tuesday will mark the 150th anniversary of the evening when a delightfully funny stage production turned into an assassination tragedy. What happened at Ford’s Theatre the night President Abraham Lincoln was shot has come to symbolize the end of one conflict and the beginning of another — a post-war struggle pitting ancient prejudices against the search for a sense of national identity 
that continues today.

But it may be that the things we don’t know about Lincoln’s assassination tell us more about ourselves than the things we think we know.

New York University history professor Martha Hodes has written a new book, “Mourning Lincoln,” that delves into how Americans really reacted to news that the president was dead. She dives into the dusty pages of personal journals, long-forgotten news accounts and other sources, and what she finds is not always pretty.

The sanitized and long-accepted version of the days following the assassination is that the nation joined in universal mourning, with thousands paying respects to the train that carried the president’s body all the way to Springfield, Ill.

That account is true, as far as outward appearances. In 1865, mourning took on an unmistakable public face, with black bunting, candles and other visible expressions of sadness considered politically correct. But not everyone mourned, even in the North.

“Copperheads,” the northern Democrats who opposed the war, and some Republicans who had opposed Lincoln could barely contain themselves. “In Bloomington, Indiana, a woman declared her intention to ‘give a grand dinner’ to mark the occasion,” Hodes writes. “In Saint Peter, Minnesota, a young woman told a Union soldier that she ‘expected to have a good time’ at a local ball ‘because Lincoln was killed’ (the man promptly withdrew his invitation). In Boston, an Irish cook made her politics known in front of her employer by ‘laughing all day’ when the news arrived.”

And when they couldn’t contain themselves, trouble often followed.

“From the Boston area came stories of a store mobbed and cleaned out, a man tarred and feathered, people ‘roughly handled,’ factory workers assaulted by fellow laborers. Word came that a man joking that Lincoln ‘had as much brain now as he ever had’ was nearly killed by a mob.”

Reading this book, it’s hard not to imagine how modern social media might have inflamed the situation. The 21st century so far has been filled with political venom that courses through the arteries of cyberspace like poison. We tend to wring our hands and lament the loss of civility and decency, and with good reason. But to a modern observer, the mid-19th century feels like familiar and comfortable territory.

Imagine if the lament a Southern woman wrote in her diary about trains being delayed had been placed in the form of a tweet and sent out to a world reeling from news of the assassination. The trains were stopped while authorities searched for assassin John Wilkes Booth, but all the woman could think about was how long it would take her to get from Philadelphia to Baltimore. “My troubles never cease,” she wrote.

Imagine if such a tweet were read by the Baltimore mourner who, as Hodes recounts it, “Told of a man exulting over the assassination … wanted the offender ‘dangling from a lamp post.’”

He might have been there with others to meet the train when it finally showed up carrying the inconvenienced woman.

We may have difficulty today understanding a postwar setting in which Union authorities would shut down houses of worship because pastors refused to acknowledge the slain president in prayers, but current conflicts between religious adherents and gay marriage advocates show we aren’t too far removed from that aspect of the 19th century, either.

The Civil War stands as a reminder that Americans are no strangers to conflicts, just as it also stands as a warning not to let those conflicts fester and grow.

In an age when thoughts can go viral in an instant, like sparks in a tinder-dry forest, it is important to understand the past, to keep its lessons close.

1 Comment
twitter blue badge link
4/5/2016 11:19:07 pm

The verification program does use a practical function. Twitter brims with bogus or parody accounts. So when customers are sifting via a list of likely usernames, it helps to have indicators to help find the precise individual they want to abide by.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    Search this site


    Like what you read here?

      Please subscribe below, and we'll let you know when there is a new opinion.

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Picture

    The author

    Jay Evensen is the Senior Editorial Columnist of the Deseret News. He has nearly 40 years experience as a reporter, editor and editorial writer in Oklahoma, New York City, Las Vegas and Salt Lake City. He also has been an adjunct journalism professor at Brigham Young and Weber State universities.

    Archives

    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012

    Categories

    All
    Campaign 2012
    Congress
    Crime
    Culture
    Iran
    Oil And Gas
    Poverty
    Steroids
    Taxes
    Utah
    Washington
    World Events
    World Events

    Links

    Deseret News
    Newslink
    Marianne Evensen's blog

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.