Jay Evensen
  • Front Page
  • Opinions
  • Second Thoughts
  • Portfolio
  • Awards
  • About

Undoing a monument would have consequences

2/22/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
Monumental questions abound.

Can a president undo the national monument designation of a previous president?

Actually, that one may be a bit premature, even though it’s being asked in a lot of corridors of power and by news organizations nationwide.

The more relevant question at the moment may be, will President Donald Trump actually rescind Barack Obama’s designation of the Bears Ears National Monument in Southern Utah? And the question that generally follows is, will he then reduce the size of the Grand Staircase-Escalante Monument?

But a larger, overriding question waits in the wings. If the president succeeds in undoing a monument designation — which never has been done — how would that change the way future presidents use 
the Antiquities Act, which grants them unilateral power to create monuments?

How would the threat that a future president might use his or her power to undo a designation change the incentives stakeholders have to negotiate in good faith when it comes to protecting scenic or sacred lands?

If you listen to Utah’s Republican political leaders, environmental groups never had much incentive to compromise over Bears Ears because they were confident Obama would give them what they wanted in a monument.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, told the KSL and Deseret News editorial boards Tuesday that if Trump undoes Bears Ears, that would change.

“At that point we’ll have those on the environmental end of the equation actually come to the table with a sincere interest in getting it done,” he said. “I don’t think in retrospect that the Department of Interior ever truly wanted to come to the table and talk it through.”

All of which may be why observers expect a hard-fought legal battle to challenge Trump’s authority, should he decide to undo what Obama did.

As a recent Washington Times piece on this issue noted, the only thing close to a precedent on the matter is a 1938 U.S. attorney general opinion stating that a president has no such revoking power. But as the paper noted, that has not been legally challenged.

The Times also quoted William Perry Pendley, president of the Mountain States Legal Foundation, saying it would be “insane” to think one president could bind all future presidents with the stroke of a pen.

The Christian Science Monitor also examined the subject, quoting a Colorado law professor and “expert” on the Antiquities Act as saying he thinks presidents have power to “modify or revoke” monuments, but that, again, courts have yet to weigh in.

Ultimately, if Trump does rescind Bears Ears, the matter may end up before the U.S. Supreme Court, where his newly nominated justice, Neil Gorsuch, might be a pivotal vote, should his appointment have been confirmed.

Trump might avoid a legal battle by simply reducing the size of the two Utah monuments. Other presidents have done this to other monuments. Again, however, their power to do so has not been challenged in court.

Meanwhile, Chaffetz and Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, are risking some of their own political capital on President Trump taking action. Each of them has met separately with Trump. Both emerged confident he would act. Both could lose a measure of influence if he doesn’t.

“Very confident,” is how Hatch described his feelings on the subject during a press availability session at the state Capitol on Wednesday. Hatch said he spent more than an hour with Trump recently and both Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante came up.

Chaffetz told the editorial boards the monuments were the first things that came up in his meeting with the president. He described Trump as “conversant” on the subject.

Chaffetz hopes to revive a version of the Public Lands Initiative he and Rep. Rob Bishop, R-Utah, had sponsored as a negotiated solution to Bears Ears and other lands issues.

If Trump undoes a monument and survives a legal challenge, it would put one more weapon in the political arsenals of future conservative candidates.
​
Presidents would retain the power to create monuments, but the threat that a future president might change everything could make them more careful, even as it might force all parties to negotiate settlements on lands issues. That might not be such a bad thing.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    Search this site


    Like what you read here?

      Please subscribe below, and we'll let you know when there is a new opinion.

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Picture

    The author

    Jay Evensen is the Senior Editorial Columnist of the Deseret News. He has nearly 40 years experience as a reporter, editor and editorial writer in Oklahoma, New York City, Las Vegas and Salt Lake City. He also has been an adjunct journalism professor at Brigham Young and Weber State universities.

    Archives

    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012

    Categories

    All
    Campaign 2012
    Congress
    Crime
    Culture
    Iran
    Oil And Gas
    Poverty
    Steroids
    Taxes
    Utah
    Washington
    World Events
    World Events

    Links

    Deseret News
    Newslink
    Marianne Evensen's blog

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.