Jay Evensen
  • Front Page
  • Opinions
  • Second Thoughts
  • Portfolio
  • Awards
  • About

So, why is tax reform necessary in Utah again?

5/7/2019

0 Comments

 
At long last, the members of a task force that might redo Utah’s tax system have been publicly announced.
I say “might” because successfully changing tax law won’t be easy.

Ten state lawmakers, including two Democrats, plus four nonvoting tax experts who supposedly will guide the discussions with a dry-eyed sense of reality, will try to craft a better tax structure within the bounds of what is politically possible.
​

But will they be up to the challenge of answering this essential question: Why is reform necessary in the first place?
Not a lot of Utahns spend their days thinking about tax reform, but among those who do, this is becoming a growing question.
Some business owners and others are challenging the very notion that the state has a sales tax “problem.” I’ve met with several of these people — mostly professionals who say if they need to begin collecting sales taxes for their services, it might drive them out of state.
They point to figures available from the State Tax Commission, showing how sales tax revenues are up over the past several years.
In fiscal year 2017-18, the state collected $220.2 million more than the previous year, for a total of about $2.7 billion. During the first nine months of the current fiscal year, collections were up by another $104 million.
And, as they point out, the state has yet to see what the impact will be from a recent Supreme Court decision allowing states to begin taxing online sales. This surely will bring in more money that has been lost through shifting consumer spending patterns.
And that’s not to mention the current $1.1 billion state surplus lawmakers faced during their last session.
So, with money like this rolling in, where is the crisis?
The answer seems to be that, while sales tax revenues are growing, income tax revenues bring in more — nearly $4 billion last year, which represented an increase of $389.5 million.
In Utah, all income taxes must go toward education. Sales taxes pay for most of everything else.
The problem, then, may be an allocation, not a collection, imbalance. But when the conversation turns in that direction, things get politically difficult in a hurry.
Would any lawmaker, let alone a majority of them, have the guts to propose changing the state constitution so that income taxes could be used for something other than education? Even if they promise to continue giving schools what they need, such a thing might look like a step back from that commitment.
But if they won’t do that, would they have the guts to tackle the many sales tax exemptions they have granted businesses through the years?
The State Tax Commission last year said 69 of these add up to $650 million per year, or about one-fifth of potential sales tax collections. These have been granted to businesses such as Delta Airlines, major employers who have been given breaks because of their importance to the local economy.
As a Utah Foundation report said last year, these exemptions come with good arguments, but “exemptions can create economic distortions and unfairly benefit specific industries over others.”
Would they undo the many earmarks, such as for roads and transportation, that eat away at the state’s general fund?
That Utah Foundation report laid out the argument for why Utah may have a sales tax problem. Over the past 45 years, it said, only one other state has seen sales tax collections decline more in relation to how much people are buying. The state collects about as much per capita in sales taxes today as it did in 1978, meaning, “as costs climb, the state is losing purchasing power…”
The report argues people are spending more on services, especially medical services, than in the past.
To which some say, so what? Who says sales tax collections have to equal income tax collections? Why not impose a statewide residential property tax, or a gross receipts tax or perhaps tack a filing fee on income tax returns?
And while we’re at it, the state constitution says not only income taxes, but all taxes on intangible property must be used for education. Some say a tax on services might be interpreted as a tax on intangible property.
All of this can get complicated mighty fast, which means plain-speaking communication and public involvement will be essential — as well as listening to those who might be affected.
Those things were sorely missing from attempts to do this during the last legislative session. That must not be the case going forward.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    Search this site


    Like what you read here?

      Please subscribe below, and we'll let you know when there is a new opinion.

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Picture

    The author

    Jay Evensen is the Senior Editorial Columnist of the Deseret News. He has nearly 40 years experience as a reporter, editor and editorial writer in Oklahoma, New York City, Las Vegas and Salt Lake City. He also has been an adjunct journalism professor at Brigham Young and Weber State universities.

    Archives

    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012

    Categories

    All
    Campaign 2012
    Congress
    Crime
    Culture
    Iran
    Oil And Gas
    Poverty
    Steroids
    Taxes
    Utah
    Washington
    World Events
    World Events

    Links

    Deseret News
    Newslink
    Marianne Evensen's blog

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.