Jay Evensen
  • Front Page
  • Opinions
  • Second Thoughts
  • Portfolio
  • Awards
  • About

Salt Lake went about shelter selection all wrong

1/4/2017

1 Comment

 
Picture
Virtually every meeting or interview I had last year with people involved in solving the Wasatch Front’s homeless problem came around to these questions:

How do you decide where to put new shelters, given that neighbors are bound to protest? How do you convince folks who have invested their lives, their families and their money into a house that the disaster zone the city allowed to fester for years around the Road Home Shelter on Rio Grande Street won’t simply be recreated in their 
neighborhood?

Now we know the answer. Salt Lake City decided the best way to proceed was to work backwards. Make the decision, buy the land, and then announce the locations of four new shelters, telling people the choices were set in stone.

This has not been the city’s finest hour.

Working backwards sends the message that city leaders had nothing to learn from the people they serve; that any objections they had would be self-serving and unimportant.

As city leaders learned Tuesday, however, they didn’t really avoid dealing with angry neighbors, after all. You can’t do that in an open government. Sooner or later, they will be heard. More than 150 of them, mostly from around the announced Sugar House shelter, packed into City Hall to give their representatives a piece of their mind.

Now, Mayor Jackie Biskupski is apparently hinting things might not be in stone, after all, saying “it’s possible” the Sugar House site could be changed.

A colleague of mine suggested this might all have been calculated ahead of time to deflect attention from the other three sites. I’m not that cynical, but it’s true that secrecy tends to breed all sorts of suspicions.

No serious allegations exist of any secret land deals, favoritism or other forms of corruption in the city’s selection of shelter sites. Most likely this is just another example of something I have observed during more than 30 years of reporting on and mingling with politicians. They tend to want to avoid angry confrontations with constituents.

State law, for example, requires politicians to hold tax-hike hearings any time they want to collect more money than they did the year before. The law is called, “truth in taxation,” and most politicians I’ve known hate it. But if they feel strongly enough about the need for more taxes, the law requires them to make that case to the public. Frequently, they end up changing their minds after hearing what people have to say.

Salt Lake City’s leaders ought to have announced the sites under consideration, listened to the people, then made the case and announced a decision. Holding a hearing before a decision becomes final gives the public at least a fighting chance to influence the outcome or provide important information.

This is not a trivial matter, nor is it an easy one. Communities have a moral obligation to the homeless who, regardless of reason, find themselves helplessly destitute. City leaders need to convince people of their responsibility to confront their own obligations to help.

The city’s backward approach sounds tempting for many reasons. For one thing, you don’t risk tipping off the real estate market where you intend to put the shelters, thus increasing costs. You don’t, as the mayor said, pit neighborhoods against each other in the selection process. You also expedite construction, rather than bogging everything down with a long process that ultimately harms the homeless the most.

But representative government was not intended to be efficient. It was intended to be representative.

Ultimately, the city will have to prove itself correct. If it designs the shelters in such a way that the homeless do not line up outside, attracting the types of criminals who currently prey on them in the Rio Grande area; if the new “holistic” approach helps people return to society; and if the shelters don’t increase crime in the vicinity, opposition will fade and the city will reap all the accolades it deserves.

Until then, you can’t blame people for seeing what has happened around the current shelter, then observing a secret relocation process at City Hall and becoming suspicious.
1 Comment
Dennis Roennebeck
1/9/2017 07:36:11 am

If the city council and mayor cannot be transparent about choosing sites for all of the new homeless shelters then they should be willing to sell their own homes and each one of them move into a home next to the shelter that they consider to be safe for any neighborhood. This would show good faith in what they are trying to do and send a clear message that they are personally invested in the program and willing to have their family home next to where ever one is put into place in the city.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    Search this site


    Like what you read here?

      Please subscribe below, and we'll let you know when there is a new opinion.

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Picture

    The author

    Jay Evensen is the Senior Editorial Columnist of the Deseret News. He has nearly 40 years experience as a reporter, editor and editorial writer in Oklahoma, New York City, Las Vegas and Salt Lake City. He also has been an adjunct journalism professor at Brigham Young and Weber State universities.

    Archives

    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012

    Categories

    All
    Campaign 2012
    Congress
    Crime
    Culture
    Iran
    Oil And Gas
    Poverty
    Steroids
    Taxes
    Utah
    Washington
    World Events
    World Events

    Links

    Deseret News
    Newslink
    Marianne Evensen's blog

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.