Jay Evensen
  • Front Page
  • Opinions
  • Second Thoughts
  • Portfolio
  • Awards
  • About

Loyalty oaths? Why Utah and Virginia are toying with them

4/19/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
If you’re upset that the Utah Republican Party is requiring its candidates to sign a pledge of loyalty to the party platform (or risk having their names read aloud as dissenters at the state convention), imagine how you would feel if the party were requiring you, as a voter, to sign a pledge before casting a ballot.

That’s what Virginia’s Republican Party had planned to do to voters in the state’s presidential primary earlier this year. Party leaders changed 
their minds at the last minute, but not before a federal judge ruled that the pledge was legal.

When it comes to politics, I’m guessing Americans aren’t fond of loyalty oaths. They bring back the smells of the early 1950s, the Un-American Activities Committee and all that.

Those memories are bad enough, even if many of us didn’t actually live through the days when the fears of communism were real. But there are practical matters at stake, here. Shouldn’t we elect people who can think for themselves; who may be of a particular philosophical bent, but who can react to problems, or perhaps even compromise to reach a solution?

If doing so would get your name read aloud in shame at the convention, who would ever agree to a less than ideologically pure solution to a problem?
Let’s be clear: Utah and Virginia have different motivations for their pledges.

In Virginia, the voter oath seemed to be meant exclusively as a way to keep Donald Trump from winning the primary. Unlike in Utah, Virginia’s Republican primary is open to all voters. But before the party backpedalled, the plan was to have everyone sign where it said, “My signature below indicates that I am a Republican.”

In Utah, state party leaders want to control access to local ballots and maintain ideological purity. In a state where the party dominates all aspects of politics, party leaders believe a new law allowing people to get on a primary ballot by collecting voter signatures might tempt the state’s few Democrats to run as Republicans. More likely, it might empower less conservative Republicans.

Two different states, two different circumstances; but they are tied together by a thin string of irony.

People like Mitt Romney have been working hard to get the national Republican Party to gain control of its nominating process in order to thwart Trump. Presumably, Virginia’s loyalty pledge might have helped that cause.

But the same Mitt Romney has expressed opposition to efforts by the Utah GOP to strengthen its grip over nominations.

"Convention/caucus systems exclude so many people," Romney wrote in an email to former Utah governor and Health and Human Services Secretary Mike Leavitt two years ago. They “rarely produce a result that reflects how rank and file Republicans feel." The email subsequently was made available to KSL.

So, which is it? Should the party control its nominating process or leave it to the rank-and-file?

Ironies can be messy. This one is situational. On a national level, a Republican victory in November is far from a sure thing. Party leaders naturally want a nominee with the best chance of winning, and so the spotlight is on how the party chooses that person.

In Utah, on the other hand, the general election is meaningless for most offices. Republicans nearly always get elected. The way to ensure robust political involvement, and a move away from control by the party’s more extreme elements, is to loosen the nominating process.

It boils down to this: If a party opens things up too much, it runs the risk that a popular TV personality who doesn’t care what the party stands for might co-opt the system and get nominated. If it becomes too insular, it stops representing the people and grants too much deference to the extremes, where the most motivated political activists tend to live.

Parties are mostly private organizations, which means they enjoy the right of free association. But competition is the great tempering device. In a competitive political marketplace, asking candidates to pledge fidelity to the entire party platform might backfire and cost votes.
​
In Utah, the Republican Party doesn’t seem to run much risk of that.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    Search this site


    Like what you read here?

      Please subscribe below, and we'll let you know when there is a new opinion.

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Picture

    The author

    Jay Evensen is the Senior Editorial Columnist of the Deseret News. He has nearly 40 years experience as a reporter, editor and editorial writer in Oklahoma, New York City, Las Vegas and Salt Lake City. He also has been an adjunct journalism professor at Brigham Young and Weber State universities.

    Archives

    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012

    Categories

    All
    Campaign 2012
    Congress
    Crime
    Culture
    Iran
    Oil And Gas
    Poverty
    Steroids
    Taxes
    Utah
    Washington
    World Events
    World Events

    Links

    Deseret News
    Newslink
    Marianne Evensen's blog

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.