Jay Evensen
  • Front Page
  • Opinions
  • Second Thoughts
  • Portfolio
  • Awards
  • About

Is voter anger good for democracy?

11/29/2018

0 Comments

 
Too bad we can’t put marijuana on the ballot every election year.

Or a 10-cent gas tax hike for education; or a razor-thin race for the fourth congressional district; or a man in the White House who in his, shall we say “unique” way, gets people excited about voting; or whatever it was that truly got people out this year.
​
I’ve been doing this a long time. The first column I wrote about voter turnout, or the lack thereof, was 20 years ago. Back then 45 percent of registered voters had just participated in an off-year election, and it was popular to do a lot of hand wringing about the future of democracy. 
Today, we wring our hands about things such as the level of incivility in our political discourse, the spread of misinformation over social media and other internet sources and the nasty left-right divisions that seem to teeter control of Congress back and forth every few years.

And voter turnout is suddenly up.

Up, that is, but not overwhelmingly great.

Utah’s official turnout rate was 75.5 percent of registered voters. That is the highest for a nonpresidential year since 1962, when the figure was 77 percent. This is good news, of course, but it must be kept in perspective.

The percentage of registered voters is only a measure of how many people who already had the initiative to register decided to actually follow through. The United States Elections Project keeps track of a more telling statistic — the percentage of eligible voters — people 18 or older who aren’t in prison — who voted.

Preliminary figures showed Utah with a 51.4 percent turnout under this definition. A pessimist might say this means almost half of eligible Utahns didn’t vote. The optimist would note that this still is a big improvement over past elections.

So the question of the day seems to be, is nastiness good for voter turnout?

By nastiness, I mean the perpetual state of rage and demonization of the other side that seems to define a portion of the electorate today, from the president on down. The answer seems to be — probably. No one expects a low turnout in 2020, especially if Donald Trump stands for re-election. This time around, control of the House seemed to be a catalyst, especially in the fourth district, which swung to the Democratic side by a margin too small to fill your local school auditorium.

Utah Lt. Gov. Spencer Cox told reporters the highest vote count for anything on the ballot was for Proposition 2, the statewide medical marijuana initiative. That means many people participated solely because of that item, not voting for anything else. That hardly qualifies them as an engaged electorate.

But he also attributed the turnout to “the political atmosphere,” saying, “Certainly, having a president that’s so controversial and every day is tweeting and getting people involved for better or worse, whichever way you look at that, definitely that’s driving things.”

During this election season, members of the KSL/Deseret News editorial board often asked candidates for federal office what they would do to end the divisiveness in Washington. When I asked that of Rep. Rob Bishop, he scoffed at the premise and gave me a quick history lesson on the long tradition of nastiness in American politics. We’re hardly plowing new ground.

That may be true, but it seems as if we’ve taken things to a new level recently. After all, when I wrote that column back in 1998, the House was getting ready to impeach President Clinton. That didn’t seem to be enough to get people interested in voting.

And if today’s high turnout rate really is a Trump effect, what happens when he no longer is on the ballot? Will we still be able to muster the rage to vote?

Is rage really the defining factor to a vibrant democracy? Should it be?

In a Deseret News op-ed published a year ago, Utah Foundation President Peter Reichard noted a clear correlation between voter turnout and high education levels, high incomes and older age groups. This may explain, at least partially, why Minnesota seems always to lead the nation in turnout, despite not always having competitive races. As a state, it ranks second in the nation for the percentage of people with an associate’s degree or higher, according to the Minnesota Office of Higher Education.
​
Getting people to vote through this route seems better for democracy in the long run than trying to keep them enraged.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    Search this site


    Like what you read here?

      Please subscribe below, and we'll let you know when there is a new opinion.

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Picture

    The author

    Jay Evensen is the Senior Editorial Columnist of the Deseret News. He has nearly 40 years experience as a reporter, editor and editorial writer in Oklahoma, New York City, Las Vegas and Salt Lake City. He also has been an adjunct journalism professor at Brigham Young and Weber State universities.

    Archives

    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012

    Categories

    All
    Campaign 2012
    Congress
    Crime
    Culture
    Iran
    Oil And Gas
    Poverty
    Steroids
    Taxes
    Utah
    Washington
    World Events
    World Events

    Links

    Deseret News
    Newslink
    Marianne Evensen's blog

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.