Jay Evensen
  • Front Page
  • Opinions
  • Second Thoughts
  • Portfolio
  • Awards
  • About

Don't let Washington crack down on false news

8/13/2018

0 Comments

 
Is it illegal to shout “Fire!” in a crowded theater?

I haven’t done a scientific analysis, but I’d be willing to wager most people think it is.

A week or so ago, Democrats and anti-gun activists were outraged when Utah Sen. Mike Lee opposed a bill that would have prohibited the publishing of blueprints for plastic guns. A common complaint was that allowing the publication would be like yelling “Fire!” in a theater.

And yet, yelling “Fire!” in a theater is perfectly legal, although perhaps not advisable.
​
But then, a lot of speech is legal but not advisable.
Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes set the pithy “fire” standard in a 1919 ruling that had nothing to do with theaters or fires. A 1969 decision involving a Ku Klux Klan leader who used ugly, racist language at a rally and urged, as he called it, “revengeance,” overturned that earlier ruling and set a new standard. The court said you must clearly urge people to commit specific crimes in order to be in trouble.

In the United States, free speech always has been complicated. The whole concept of the First Amendment requires us to tolerate expressions we find personally abhorrent.

Which leads me to Russia, social media and the elections.

U.S intelligence agencies are adamant that Russian operatives are planting false stories on social media in hopes of influencing elections. Facebook reportedly is hard at work trying to identify and remove these accounts, which is its right as a private company.

The problem, of course, is that American politics — so recently democratized by the internet, where everyone can publish just as easily as the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal — is such fertile ground for lies.

Earlier this year, three MIT scholars published a study that put this in a new perspective. They developed an objective model for identifying whether news stories on Twitter were true or false, then studied how quickly they spread.

As one of the co-authors described it on an MIT news website, they were “somewhere between surprised and stunned” to find out that false news spread much faster than true news. It wasn’t even close.

And the reason had everything to do with humans, not with bots.

People are 70 percent more likely to spread false news than the truth. The researchers also found it takes six times longer for a true story to reach 1,500 people than a false one.

It shouldn’t be too hard to understand why. Truth can be boring. As the researchers put it, people want attention, or to give the impression they are “in the know” by spreading interesting things others haven’t heard.

So, what to do about this?

In a recent Washington Post op-ed, Alina Polyakova of the Brookings Institution and Geysha Gonzalez of the Atlantic Council argued for treating false news the way the government and the culture treat cigarette smoking.

This would involve warnings from the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, support from private-sector agencies and nationwide public education campaigns.

But it also would involve government control. With smoking, Washington bent the First Amendment a bit by banning all broadcast commercials for cigarettes. In this case, the authors advocate for Washington to treat major social media companies as broadcast media, subjecting them to a slew of regulations concerning content and advertising.

That won’t fly, nor should it.

In the first place, much of the internet thrives on an attitude of suspicion toward government control. Tight regulations would merely add to that, lending fuel to conspiracy theories.

John Milton, the 17th century author and a major influence for freedom of speech, advocated letting truth and error grapple in the daylight. “Who ever knew truth put to the worst, in a free and open encounter?" he asked.

The answer to that question may seem more in doubt now than at any time before, and yet the heavy hand of Washington doesn’t seem to be the right remedy.

A recent Cato Institute survey on the First Amendment found Americans have some seemingly contradictory opinions on free speech. For instance, 79 percent said “hate speech” is unacceptable, but 59 percent opposed laws banning such speech.

Crazy? No, it sounds like most Americans really get it, after all. 

Americans can’t afford to banish error to the shadows where it can grow and fester without opposition.  By all means, warn us, point out errors, delete foreign accounts, impose sanctions and go after the bad guys.
​
Yell “Fire!” in the crowded theater of social media, but then let people decide what to do about it. 
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    Search this site


    Like what you read here?

      Please subscribe below, and we'll let you know when there is a new opinion.

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Picture

    The author

    Jay Evensen is the Senior Editorial Columnist of the Deseret News. He has nearly 40 years experience as a reporter, editor and editorial writer in Oklahoma, New York City, Las Vegas and Salt Lake City. He also has been an adjunct journalism professor at Brigham Young and Weber State universities.

    Archives

    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012

    Categories

    All
    Campaign 2012
    Congress
    Crime
    Culture
    Iran
    Oil And Gas
    Poverty
    Steroids
    Taxes
    Utah
    Washington
    World Events
    World Events

    Links

    Deseret News
    Newslink
    Marianne Evensen's blog

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.