Jay Evensen
  • Front Page
  • Opinions
  • Second Thoughts
  • Portfolio
  • Awards
  • About

Don't close the Road Home shelter quite yet

10/2/2018

0 Comments

 
If you live in Salt Lake City, you probably don’t think homelessness is being solved.

A new poll commissioned by Utahpolicy.com found that 45 percent say homelessness and panhandling are about the same today as when a coalition of state, county and city leaders began a concerted crackdown a little more than a year ago.
​
Another 24 percent said the problem has gotten worse. That’s a combined 69 percent of city residents who say, regardless of what official crime figures might indicate, the plan isn’t working.
The homeless were supposed to have been separated from the criminals who prey on them, and given help. The criminals were supposed to be removed and prosecuted. And yet both the appearance of homelessness (not all who look down on their luck actually are homeless) and panhandling remain problems.

Well, hang on just a second. As an observer of Utah politics for the past 32 years, I can tell you the multi-agency effort that began in the summer of 2017 deserves respect. The situation around the shelter on Rio Grande Street had become intolerable after a summer of lawlessness and murder, and now it’s better.

The overall aim of the effort — to help the homeless heal and fix their lives — was the right approach.

But everyone involved needs to understand two things.

The first is that homelessness cannot be solved for good, the way you fix a leaky roof or build a better water system to accommodate growth. As long as people suffer debilitating problems, lose jobs or wrestle with substance abuse and mental illnesses, a certain percentage of people will be unable to manage housing on their own. As the population increases, these numbers will increase, too.

The second is that the current effort comes with no guarantees. It represents ideas politicians and others devised. Some others, myself included, had different ideas. This isn’t high school math. You can’t check your work with the indisputably correct answer in the back of the book.

But it’s also not an essay question to be judged by a professor. We will know, shortly after the plan is fully implemented, whether it really works.

All of which means the politicians involved should remain nimble and ready to adapt. That may not be easy considering the political negotiating that went into the current plan, and the amount of money already spent.

The state of Utah recently agreed to buy the old Road Home shelter on Rio Grande for $4 million. Given the uncertainties, and the overwhelming perception of city residents that, at the very least, nothing has improved, it seems wise to wait before doing anything different with that building for a while.

Three new homeless shelters, officially called “resource centers,” are under construction in separate locations. Add up all the new beds — 300 at the men’s shelter and 200 each at the women’s and mixed-gender facilities — and it falls several hundred short of what the current shelter holds.

One more problem complicates it all. When you put separate homeless populations in separate locations, you hit a math problem that does indeed have an answer in the back of the book. On a cold night, you may have hundreds more single men in need of a warm place to stay than what the men’s shelter can hold, while space remains at the other two shelters.

This is the main reason I advocated for a single, large shelter where populations could remain separate, but where walls could be moved to accommodate specific needs.

Officials I’ve talked to about this say they will give motel vouchers to people who don’t fit in the shelters on a given night. Does that sound like a great plan?

A better idea would be to keep the Road Home Shelter available as a backup, at least for now. State law requires the Road Home close next June 30. That can be changed, at least until we know whether the aggressive plan to transition people out of homelessness works.

The hope, of course, is that closing the Rio Grande shelter would move the panhandlers and drifters away from tourists and the daily work crowd. That’s naïve for three reasons.

First, panhandlers will go where the people are. Second, it’s wrong to equate panhandlers with the homeless. Third, some homeless people, for whatever reason, would rather sleep anywhere than in a resource center.

That means politicians and professionals should be committed to constantly adapting, finding the best ways to deal with the needs of the least fortunate among us.
​
It also means that, while public opinion is important, it may not be the best measure of success.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    Search this site


    Like what you read here?

      Please subscribe below, and we'll let you know when there is a new opinion.

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Picture

    The author

    Jay Evensen is the Senior Editorial Columnist of the Deseret News. He has nearly 40 years experience as a reporter, editor and editorial writer in Oklahoma, New York City, Las Vegas and Salt Lake City. He also has been an adjunct journalism professor at Brigham Young and Weber State universities.

    Archives

    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012

    Categories

    All
    Campaign 2012
    Congress
    Crime
    Culture
    Iran
    Oil And Gas
    Poverty
    Steroids
    Taxes
    Utah
    Washington
    World Events
    World Events

    Links

    Deseret News
    Newslink
    Marianne Evensen's blog

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.