Jay Evensen
  • Front Page
  • Opinions
  • Second Thoughts
  • Portfolio
  • Awards
  • About

Apple's stand honors freedom over security

2/17/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
The @FBI is creating a world where citizens rely on #Apple to defend their rights, rather than the other way around. – Ed Snowden on Twitter.
 
Apple, like any other business or a politician, responds to the wishes of the people.
And at the moment, tough privacy protection is popular.
​
That may or may not matter as the largest privacy showdown in modern history begins to unfold in the courts. Not long ago, however, things would have been quite different.

A year ago, The Atlantic calculated that if Apple were a country, it would be the 55th richest one in the world. If any company has the power to stand firm against the FBI’s demands, this is it.

But circumstances surrounding the company’s popular stand against that agency say a lot about 
how far things have changed since the terrorist attacks of 2001. Back then, only one senator, Russ Feingold, D-Wisc., voted against the Patriot Act, which gave the government broad new powers to investigate and intercept terrorists. It passed the House, 357-66.

As late as 2010, a Washington Post poll found that 63 percent of Americans said they worried the White House would “not go far enough to investigate terrorism because of concerns about constitutional rights.” By 2013, that had changed dramatically, with 48 percent worrying the government would go too far, and only 41 percent worried it wouldn’t go far enough.

The difference has nothing to do with a sudden, mass education on constitutional principles. It has everything to do with Edward Snowden and his dramatic outing, in 2013, of the government’s collection of telephone and other personal data through the National Security Agency.

But now we find ourselves in a situation where the reasoning behind each of those moments in opinion polling collides. The government claims it needs access to data in order to protect the American people from terrorists. Specifically, it wants to get into the phone owned by the late Syed Farook who, along with his wife, killed 14 people in a December terrorist attack in San Bernardino, Calif.

Apple itself can’t get into the phone. Its latest operating system will destroy data after 10 incorrect attempts to access an iPhone with a password. As Tim Cook, Apple’s CEO, said a year ago to the Telegraph, “…we don’t want to know what you bought, how much you paid for it and where you bought it.”

But U.S. Judge Sheri Pym has ordered Apple to write software that would open the phone to inspection. Apple refused, insisting this would open a door that makes all its phones vulnerable.

You couldn’t manufacture a case that better illustrates the values involved in the struggle between freedom and security. The government might be said to have probable cause, as the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution requires, for such a search in the name of public safety.

Apple, on the other hand, makes a practical argument for the freedom from government intrusion, based on some stark 21st century realities.

Once software is created to open an encrypted phone, it cannot then be un-created. At best, the government would want to use it again and again in other criminal investigations. At worst, it would find its way into the hands of criminals.
Terrorism isn’t the only issue here. As Americans know all-too-well, identity theft doesn’t require a culprit with jihadist tendencies. This is as much about Americans’ pocketbooks as anything.

I can claim a measure of ideological purity on this one, having warned against the Patriot Act from the beginning. But support for Snowden is another thing. He seems to put everything ahead of national security, and I can’t go that far.

Apple’s Tim Cook seems to be carefully walking the line between security and freedom, as well. In a message to customers, he spoke of his “great respect for the professionals at the FBI,” and called their intentions “good.” He denounced terrorism and referred to a deep “respect for American democracy and a love of our country.”
​
But, ultimately, that love has to extend to its constitutional guarantees of liberty. Otherwise, there wouldn’t be much of American left to love.
That’s true no matter which side is more popular at the moment
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    Search this site


    Like what you read here?

      Please subscribe below, and we'll let you know when there is a new opinion.

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Picture

    The author

    Jay Evensen is the Senior Editorial Columnist of the Deseret News. He has nearly 40 years experience as a reporter, editor and editorial writer in Oklahoma, New York City, Las Vegas and Salt Lake City. He also has been an adjunct journalism professor at Brigham Young and Weber State universities.

    Archives

    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012

    Categories

    All
    Campaign 2012
    Congress
    Crime
    Culture
    Iran
    Oil And Gas
    Poverty
    Steroids
    Taxes
    Utah
    Washington
    World Events
    World Events

    Links

    Deseret News
    Newslink
    Marianne Evensen's blog

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.