Jay Evensen
  • Front Page
  • Opinions
  • Second Thoughts
  • Portfolio
  • Awards
  • About

Admission scandal isn't higher education's only problem

9/18/2019

0 Comments

 
Do you believe actress Felicity Huffman got off with a light sentence — two weeks in prison, a $30,000 fine and community service — for paying someone to rig SAT answers so her daughter could be admitted to the acting school of her choice?

Or maybe you believe the sentence fit the crime, or perhaps that prison is too harsh.
​

I’m not going to shed much light on these questions, other than to pose another one. If Huffman, or the 51 other people charged in the college admissions scandal uncovered by an FBI probe known as “operation varsity blues,” had instead donated richly, and legally, to the school of their choice, and their children had been given preference on that basis, would it have been much different?
The obvious initial answer is yes. The 52 defendants were charged with bribing, cheating on tests and falsely asserting their children were athletes in order to gain admissions. These are dishonest, criminal acts that, allowed to proceed, would destroy the integrity of the nation’s system of higher education.
At the same time, however, let’s not pretend that many prestigious universities treat all applicants the same, regardless of wealth, celebrity or benevolence.
In his now 13-year-old book, “The price of admission: How America’s ruling class buys its way into elite colleges — and who gets left outside the gates,” Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Golden details how the wealthy and influential work the system to the benefit of their children.
The book’s introduction details how two rival politicians, Al Gore and former Republican Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, had sons admitted to Harvard and Princeton, respectively.
“Both were middling students who preferred partying to homework and the company of jocks to scholars,” the book says. “Their academic records — and, in the teenage Albert Gore III’s case, brushes with authority — would ordinarily have destined them for second-tier colleges. Yet both were admitted ahead of thousands of stellar candidates to their first and only choices, two of the nation’s best and most selective universities …”
My point isn’t to draw a connecting line between preferential admissions practices and the college admissions scandal. In addition to lying and cheating, the defendants in “operation varsity blues” didn’t provide anything of value to the schools in question. Distinguished alumni at least make donations or lend prestige to their alma maters through their achievements or election to high office.
But these persistent practices, coupled with rising tuition and a nationwide student loan burden that now tops $1.6 trillion, challenge the notion of any sort of egalitarianism when it comes to opportunities based on merit, and that’s not good for the country. 
The overriding question is whether anything will come along to disrupt this age-old system, or the dominance of legacy institutions whose diplomas carry enormous weight in the marketplace.
A decade ago, I was writing about how free online courses and a tech industry that valued learning, innovation and creative energy over degrees would disrupt a tradition-bound system of higher education.
I’m still waiting.
Meanwhile, a number of smart people are seeing signs of change on the horizon. 
Aaron M. Renn, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, wrote a piece last year that identified six forces that could change higher education as we know it. These included the high costs of tuition and the student-debt burden, the availability of online courses, and a “credentialing cartel” the tech industry continues to challenge. It also included an interesting twist on the coming population bust, which I have outlined in previous columns. Overall enrollment will soon plunge, which could challenge the existence of some colleges.
Ray Schroeder wrote a piece for insidehighered.com that said “microcredentialing” could help to raise the profile of online courses that provide the “communication, leadership and social skills that businesses say our graduates lack…”
Writing for Forbes.com, contributor Brandon Busteed wrote earlier this year about a study that suggests companies will hire talented students directly out of high school and then pay for their college education. He predicted as many as a third of all traditional students will be doing this during the next decade.
“This shift will go down as the biggest disruption in higher education …” he said.
If they come, these types of disruptions wouldn’t likely end attempts at cheating — a practice probably as old as the human race. Nor would they put an end to the oversized influences of the rich and famous. 
But they could make higher education a little more accessible and fair to everyone else. Ultimately, that also could make traditional efforts to game the system seem all the more pathetic.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    Search this site


    Like what you read here?

      Please subscribe below, and we'll let you know when there is a new opinion.

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Picture

    The author

    Jay Evensen is the Senior Editorial Columnist of the Deseret News. He has nearly 40 years experience as a reporter, editor and editorial writer in Oklahoma, New York City, Las Vegas and Salt Lake City. He also has been an adjunct journalism professor at Brigham Young and Weber State universities.

    Archives

    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012

    Categories

    All
    Campaign 2012
    Congress
    Crime
    Culture
    Iran
    Oil And Gas
    Poverty
    Steroids
    Taxes
    Utah
    Washington
    World Events
    World Events

    Links

    Deseret News
    Newslink
    Marianne Evensen's blog

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.