Jay Evensen
  • Front Page
  • Opinions
  • Second Thoughts
  • Portfolio
  • Awards
  • About

Utah tax reform: Here are four things to consider

12/3/2019

0 Comments

 
Utah lawmakers seem intent on holding a special session a week from Thursday to begin passing a tax overhaul package that has more moving parts than anything you will assemble Christmas morning.
In government, parts tend to move in unintended ways. In that sense, haste may not always make waste, but it may make things people can’t foresee. 
But if legislators insist on being hasty, here are four things they at least ought to keep in mind.
First, don’t tell Utahns you are “restoring” the full state portion of the sales tax on groceries. That language assumes the money rightfully belongs to the government, not the people being taxed. Republicans understood this concept well a decade ago when they fought efforts to “restore” the Bush tax cuts.
Raising the tax on unprepared food from 1.75% to 4.85% is a tax increase on one of life’s biggest necessities. It would take money out of the pockets of real people, and it would especially hurt the low- to moderate-income people who earn just enough to not qualify for assistance. It is both a tax increase and a policy decision. 
You may call it removing an exemption, if you like. Groceries currently are exempted from a portion of the state’s sales tax. But then you would need to compare it to the many other tax exemptions the state grants. 
Last year, the State Tax Commission said 69 of these added to $650 million per year that otherwise would go into state coffers. These have been given mainly to major employers that are considered important to the local economy. 
Economic development is important. So is helping struggling people buy food. A once yearly tax credit won’t make it easier to buy groceries today.
Second, stop saying tax reform already has received enough public attention and input. The Deseret News quoted Senate President Stuart Adams saying reform already had received more attention than it would have during the regular 45-day legislative session that begins in January.
This is a flimsy justification for hurrying the process in a special session. 
Yes, lawmakers traveled the state this year and held public hearings. They presented a detailed statement outlying what lawmakers perceive to be an imbalance in tax revenues and they listened to how Utahns feel, in general, about taxes and reform.
But the actual bill lawmakers will consider Dec. 12 won’t be ready for review until Dec. 9. That is the document that needs the thorough vetting of a legislative session. The devil, as the saying goes, lives in details.
Third, perhaps the largest part of the overall tax reform plan will be a constitutional change allowing the state to use income tax revenue for something other than education. That would require a public vote. 
The public can be fickle. Last year, voters turned down a gas tax hike that would have freed up more general-fund money for education, essentially ruining a plan that ended an initiative drive for more school funding. 
What happens if voters reject this constitutional change, too? If lawmakers reduce income taxes during the special session, wouldn’t that leave schools shortchanged? 
Lawmakers should explain why they don’t let voters tackle the income tax issue first, then implement tax reform later. The obvious answer is that the 2020 elections might change the players in charge, but those are the players who would have to deal with a mess if voters reject the constitutional change.
Finally, the most likely way lawmakers would ensure that a shift away from income taxes won’t hurt schools is to allow local school districts greater leeway in raising and spending property taxes. 
If so, they should remember that taxes don’t exist in a vacuum. Just two examples: Salt Lake County leaders are contemplating a property tax hike of 7.88% right now, or nearly $16 million. Utah County is considering a hike that would virtually double the county’s portion of property taxes there. 
The same people who pay these would pay higher school district taxes, as well as the higher gas taxes and food taxes, and the taxes on selected services lawmakers are considering. The proposed cut in income taxes from 4.95% to 4.64% might not be seen as making up for it all.
Lawmakers say they want the income tax cut to be ready for all workers to enjoy beginning Jan. 1. A recent statement from the Tax Commission said this likely won’t happen unless Utah workers change their withholdings to reflect new tax tables, which won’t be ready for a while.
In the end, there may be no way to stop lawmakers from hurrying to meet next week. Utahns just need to remember that we won’t know whether all the parts fit together for quite some time.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    Search this site


    Like what you read here?

      Please subscribe below, and we'll let you know when there is a new opinion.

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Picture

    The author

    Jay Evensen is the Senior Editorial Columnist of the Deseret News. He has nearly 40 years experience as a reporter, editor and editorial writer in Oklahoma, New York City, Las Vegas and Salt Lake City. He also has been an adjunct journalism professor at Brigham Young and Weber State universities.

    Archives

    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012

    Categories

    All
    Campaign 2012
    Congress
    Crime
    Culture
    Iran
    Oil And Gas
    Poverty
    Steroids
    Taxes
    Utah
    Washington
    World Events
    World Events

    Links

    Deseret News
    Newslink
    Marianne Evensen's blog

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.