Jay Evensen
  • Front Page
  • Opinions
  • Second Thoughts
  • Portfolio
  • Awards
  • About

How many votes are enough to make a winner?

10/18/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
John Curtis won the Republican primary for the state’s third congressional district, a three-way race, with 43.28 percent of the vote. He will be the party’s candidate in next months’ general election, but does his inability to get a clear majority of votes mean he has less than total support from members of his party?

My guess is many people would say no. The winner of a substantial plurality is just as legitimate as the winner of a majority.

But would we feel the same about Curtis if he had won with 35 percent? How about 20 percent? At what point does a victory signal something less than the will of the people?

​These questions could become much more relevant in Utah soon as voters face ballot initiatives that, if successful, could increase the number of names we see on future primary ballots.

Don’t think there aren’t people out there who believe they have the answers.
Earlier this week I met with state Rep. Rebecca Chavez-Houck, D-Salt Lake. Last year she sponsored a bill that would have instituted something called ranked-choice voting in certain partisan Utah races.

Simply put, this would have given voters the option to rank multiple candidates by their order of preference. In a three-way race, for instance, you would indicate which candidate is your first, second and third choice.

If no candidate receives a clear majority, the one with the fewest first-choice votes would be eliminated, with his or her second-choice votes being distributed. When those votes are tallied, one of the two remaining candidates would have more than 50 percent of the vote.

The bill had a long list of Republican and Democrat co-sponsors. It sailed through the House on a 59-12 vote before failing in the Senate.

Chavez-Houck said the bill will return in the 2018 legislative session, but it will be narrowly focused on non-partisan municipal races, and its lead sponsor will be Marc Roberts, R-Salem.

Utah isn’t the only state looking at this. Voters in Maine decided last year to use this method for all except municipal and presidential elections. But supporters here tell me Utah would have been a perfect place to use this for last year’s presidential election.

The argument goes like this: A lot of people weren’t happy with the two main candidates but were afraid to vote for Evan McMullin or some other third-party person because it felt like wasting a vote. If they could have voted for a third party while still marking either Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton a second choice, their worries would have eased.

I’m not so sure I buy that argument, but ranked-choice supporters do have a different argument that resonates. Their method would make election season less nasty and uncivil.

Instead of insulting opponents and their supporters with wild accusations, candidates would focus more on convincing those people to include them as at least a second choice. We might even get back to the days of hearing the phrase, “My worthy opponent …”

The plan has its detractors. Some say it would be too confusing, and that might reduce turnout. That’s a big concern in Utah, where a new Utah Foundation analysis just determined the state finished a dismal 39th nationally in turnout last fall.

Supporters, not surprisingly, say it would have the exact opposite effect. 

In general, democracy can be a maddeningly imperfect method for choosing leaders. As Winston Churchill famously told the House of Commons in 1947, it is the worst form of government, except for all the others.

Donald Trump’s critics are quick to remind Americans he received only 46 percent of the popular vote last year. And while that was unique because of the Electoral College, he joins a long line of presidents who got less than 50 percent, including Bill Clinton both times he won and John Quincy Adams, who got 31 percent in 1824.

Leaders of the Count My Vote initiative, who recently re-launched their bid to take away the nominating power of political convention caucuses, reportedly have set a 35 percent threshold to avoid a runoff election.
​
Is that a good cutoff for crowning someone the people’s choice?
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    Search this site


    Like what you read here?

      Please subscribe below, and we'll let you know when there is a new opinion.

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Picture

    The author

    Jay Evensen is the Senior Editorial Columnist of the Deseret News. He has nearly 40 years experience as a reporter, editor and editorial writer in Oklahoma, New York City, Las Vegas and Salt Lake City. He also has been an adjunct journalism professor at Brigham Young and Weber State universities.

    Archives

    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012

    Categories

    All
    Campaign 2012
    Congress
    Crime
    Culture
    Iran
    Oil And Gas
    Poverty
    Steroids
    Taxes
    Utah
    Washington
    World Events
    World Events

    Links

    Deseret News
    Newslink
    Marianne Evensen's blog

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.